Legal Scholarships
Predictive Coding Has Arrived, 28-FALL ANTITRUST 93 (2013)
December 2013
A Pragmatic Approach to Discovery Reform: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference in Civil Discovery, 64 S.C. L. REV. 495 (2013)
December 2013
The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review, 7 FED. CTS. L. REV. 1 (2013), http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2010/grossman.pdf
December 2013
American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts 3d, Managing Metadata in Litigation Matters, 126 AMJUR POF 3d 281
December 2013
Staying Out of Trouble: Legal Ethics in a Digital Era, 32 No. 3 TRIAL ADVOC. Q. 23 (2013)
December 2013
Boilerplate Discovery Objections: How They Are Used, Why They Are Wrong, and What We Can Do About Them, 61 DRAKE L. REV. 913 (2013)
December 2013
Ethical Issues in E-Discovery, Social Media, and the Cloud, 39 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 125 (2013)
December 2013
An E-Discovery Model Order: Saving the Golden Goose of Patent Litigation One Golden Egg at a Time, 4 CYBARIS AN INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 250 (2013), http://web.wmitchell.edu/cybaris/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/vol4_issue2_Kuxhausen-E-Discovery-Model-Order.pdf
December 2013
Looking Past the Debate: Proposed Revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 7 FED. CTS. L. REV. 178 (2013), http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2010/Shaffer2.pdf
December 2013
Resolving the Civil Litigant’s Discovery Dilemma, 26 GEO. J. LEGAL ETHICS 837 (2013)
December 2013
Cooperation and Litigation: Thoughts on the American Experience, 61 U. KAN. L. REV. 821 (2013), http://www.law.ku.edu/sites/law.drupal.ku.edu/files/docs/law_review/v61/01-Marcus_Final.pdf
December 2013
Reinvigorating Rule 502, 81 FORDHAM L. REV. 1533 (2013), http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4871&context=flr
December 2013
The Implications of Rule 26(G) on the Use of Technology-Assisted Review, 7 FED. CTS. L. REV. 239 (2013), http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2010/Gricks.pdf
December 2013
A Mandate for Failure: The Sedona Cooperation Proclamation and Modern Discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 35 U. LA VERNE L. REV. 165 (2013)
December 2013
E-Discovery: Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, Where We’re Going, 12 AVE MARIA L. REV. 1 (2014), http://legacy.avemarialaw.edu/lr/assets/articles/v12i1.E-Discovery%20Panel%20Transcript.pdf
May 2014
Understanding and Contextualizing Precedents in E-Discovery: The Illusion of Stare Decisis and Best Practices to Avoid Reliance on Outdated Guidance, 20 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 8 (2014), http://jolt.richmond.edu/v20i2/article8.pdf
May 2014
E-Discovery under the Minnesota Rules: Where We’ve Been, Where We Might Be Headed, 40 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 390 (2014), http://www.wmitchell.edu/lawreview/Volume40/documents/Herr.pdf
May 2014
The 2015 Proposals to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Preparing for the Future of Discovery, 41 N. KY. L. REV. 133 (2014), http://chaselaw.nku.edu/content/dam/chaselaw/docs/academics/lawreview/v41/11-Morris.pdf
May 2014
Using Technology to Facilitate Production of E-Discovery, 40 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 588 (2014), http://www.wmitchell.edu/lawreview/Volume40/documents/WG5.pdf
May 2014
Preparation for Minnesota Federal and State Discovery Conferences: A Practical Approach, 40 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 549 (2014), http://www.wmitchell.edu/lawreview/Volume40/documents/WG4.pdf
May 2014
An Electronic Discovery Primer, 40 WM. MITCHELL L. REV. 427 (2014), http://www.wmitchell.edu/lawreview/Volume40/documents/WG1.pdf
May 2014
Predictive Coding and the Proportionality Doctrine: A Marriage Made in Big Data, 26 REGENT U. L. REV. 7 (2013-14), http://ralphlosey.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/law_review_pcandpropor.pdf
December 2013
Predictive Coding: Taking the Devil Out of the Details, 74 LA. L. REV. 613 (2013), http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6452&context=lalrev
December 2013
Searching for an Answer: Defensible E-Discovery Search Techniques in the Absence of Judicial Voice, 16 CHAP. L. REV. 407 (2013)
December 2013
Inadvertent Production of Privileged Information in Discovery in Federal Court: The Need for Well-Drafted Clawback Agreements, 64 S.C. L. REV. 581 (2013), http://www.nathancrystal.com/pdf/ClawbackAgreements.pdf
December 2013
Informed Buyers of E-Discovery: Why General Counsel Must Become Tech Savvy, 5 HASTINGS SCI. & TECH. L.J. 281 (2013), http://hstlj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/STLJ-Didday-Informed-Buyers-of-E-Discovery.pdf
December 2013
How to Avoid the Death of Your Case by Two Billion Paper Cuts: Encouraging Arbitration as an Alternative Way to Resolve Costly Discovery Disputes, 13 PEPP. DISP. RESOL. L.J. 257 (2013), http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol13/iss2/2
December 2013
Protecting Search Terms as Opinion Work Product: Applying the Work Product Doctrine to Electronic Discovery, 161 U. PA. L. REV. 2063 (2013), http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=penn_law_review
December 2013
“The [Judicial] Beatings Will Continue until Morale Improves”: The Prisoner’s Dilemma of Cooperative Discovery and Proposals for Improved Morale, 43 U. BALT. L.F. 107 (2013)
December 2013
Making Ethics Worth Your While: Controlling Costs in E-Discovery, Ethics in E-Discovery: Leading Lawyers on Navigating Rules and Regulations and Effectively Handling Privacy Issues in the E-Discovery Process (Aspatore Aug. 2012) (paperback).
August 2012
E-Discovery - Predictive Coding Algorithms, 29 No. 2 FEDERAL LITIGATOR 9 (Feb. 2014)
February 2014
Electronic Discovery: Law and Practice, § 13.03 A Lawyer’s Duty to Others 2014 WL 100212
May 2014
Electronic Discovery: Law and Practice, § 5.08 Limiting the Costs of Electronic Discovery, 2014 WL 100159
May 2014
Accounting for the Costs of Elec. Discovery, 12 MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. 151, 178, 189 (Winter 2011), http://mjlst.umn.edu/prod/groups/ahc/@pub/@ahc/@mjlst/documents/asset/ahc_asset_366139.pdf.
December 2011
Cooperation—What Is It and Why Do It?, 18 RICH. J. L. & TECH. 8, 12-14 (2012), http://jolt.richmond.edu/v18i3/article8.pdf.
March 2012
Ghost in the Machine: Zubulake Revisited and Other Emerging E-Discovery Issues Under the Amended Federal Rules, 18 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 11, 12-4 (2012), http://jolt.richmond.edu/v18i3/article11.pdf.
April 2012
The Sedona Conference® Points the Way Toward Control of the Costs and Burden of E-Discovery, 59 THE FED. LAWYER 46 (Feb. 2012).
February 2012
The Promise of A Coop. and Proportional Discovery Process in N.C.: H.B. 380 and the New State Elec. Discovery Rules, 34 CAMPBELL L. REV. 233, 253-55, 262-63, 277 (2012), http://law.campbell.edu/lawreview/articles/34-2-233.pdf.
March 2012
Trust, Respect, and Cooperation May Keep Us Out of Jail: A Practical Guide to Navigating the European Union Privacy Directive's Restrictions on American Discovery Procedure, 25 GEO. J. LEGAL ETHICS 623, 642 (Summer 2012).
July 2012
Managing Exchanges of Electronically Stored Information (Esi) in Construction Arbitration, DISP. RESOL. J. 68, 71 (Oct. 2012).
October 2012
9 Side Bar No. 2, at 5-6, 11 (Fed. Litig. Sec. of the Fed. Bar Assoc. Summer 2009)
June 2009
The Quest for "Proportionality" in Elec. Discovery-Moving from Theory to Reality in Civ. Litig., 5 FED. CTS. L. REV. 171, 173 (2011), www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2010/Hirt.pdf.
December 2011
Four Years Later: How the 2006 Amendments to the Fed. Rules Have Reshaped the E-Discovery Landscape and Are Revitalizing the Civ. Justice Sys., 17 RICH. J. L. & TECH. 10, 1 (2011), http://jolt.richmond.edu/v17i3/article10.pdf.
April 2011
Electronic Discovery: Law and Practice, Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program, Phase One and Report Excerpts, 2014 WL 100120
May 2014
Electronic Discovery: Law and Practice, United States District Court Rules, 2014 WL 100114
May 2014
10 SEDONA CONF. J. 215, 216 (2009).
September 2009
Some Thoughts on the Lawyer's E-Volving Duties in Discovery, 36 N. KY. L. REV. 521, 539-40, 545 (2009).
September 2009
Living Daily with Weekley Homes, 51 THE ADVOC. (Tex.) 23 (Summer 2010), http://www.ccsb.com/pdf/Publications/Business%20Litigation/Living_Daily_With_Weekly_Homes.pdf.
July 2010
How Can Courts Encourage Cooperation in Discovery?, 1 MAGNA-FY Quaterly, Issue 4, at 5 (Mar. 4, 2011), http://www.magnals.com/magna-fy/pdf/20110304.pdf.
March 2011
New Paradigm For Discovery Practice: Cooperation, 43 MD. B. J. 26 (Dec. 2010).
December 2010
E-Discovery Today: The Fault Lies Not in Our Rules . . ., 4 FED. CTS. L. REV. 131, 159-60, 162, 164 (Feb. 2011), http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2010/Milberg-Hausfeld.pdf.
December 2011
E-Discovery Meets the Cloud, N.Y. ST. B.J. 45 (May 2011), http://www.nysba.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Commercial_and_Federal_Litigation_Home&ContentID=49047&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.
May 2011
Spoliation of Elec. Evidence: Sanctions Versus Advocacy, 18 MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 1, 48 (2011), http://www.mttlr.org/voleighteen/adams.pdf.
December 2011
Alternative Dispute Resolution Expands into Pre-Trial Practice: An Intro. to the Role of E-Neutrals, 13 CARDOZO J. CONFLICT RESOL. 113, 119, 120-22 (2011), http://cojcr.org/vol13no1/Skinner.pdf.
December 2011
No Fishing Poles in the Office, 78 DEF. COUNS. J. 450, 474 (2011).
December 2011