Reasonable security test

Thursday, February 28, 2019 - 8:40am to 9:55am
Panel Description: 

A panel of WG11 drafting team members will lead a dialogue on their draft Commentary that evaluates what “legal test” a court or other adjudicative body should apply, or what other approach it should follow, in a situation where a party has or is alleged to have a legal obligation to provide “reasonable security” for personal information and the issue is whether the party in question has met that legal obligation. While preparing this draft Commentary, the drafting team examined decisions of courts and regulatory bodies and the work of scholars and other writers in the field.


Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Kansas City, MO, USA

Dialogue Leaders

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

New York, NY, USA

Bennett Jones LLP

Toronto, ON, Canada

The Crypsis Group
Carlton Fields

Tampa, FL, USA

Federal Trade Commission