[Panel 2] The Range of Equitable Remedies in Trade Secret Litigation

[mission statement for corresponding Drafting Team 3: Equitable relief must, by definition, be tailored to the circumstances. The WG12 Commentary on Equitable Relief in Trade Secret Litigation will focus on helping parties and courts identify and assess the wide range of equitable (i.e., non-monetary) remedies that may be available at various stages of trade secret litigation and the circumstances under which they may be most suitable. Among the remedies to be considered are mandatory and prohibitory relief; monitoring by third parties, certifications, and other affirmative acts to protect trade secrets; and pre- and post-trial restraints on the activities of those alleged to possess or to have used or improperly received trade secrets.]

Date: 
Monday, November 5, 2018 - 10:30am to 12:00pm

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

San Francisco, CA, USA

Fisher & Phillips LLP

Atlanta, GA, USA

Trailblazer

Miami, FL, USA

Boston Scientific
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP

San Jose, CA, USA

University of Virginia School of Law

Gainesville, FL, USA